Not really - with every large, fragmented fall there are almost always more smaller rather than larger stones. In other words, while they may be at the "light" end of the strewnfield, meteorite density is probably going to be the greatest there. Regards, Jason
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Richard Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote: > Could this be why apparently so few stones have been found so far? The > hunters are actually looking at the "light" end of the field and the large > stones are still 20+ miles down range? > > -- > Richard Kowalski > Full Moon Photography > IMCA #1081 > > > --- On Wed, 4/21/10, Matson, Robert D. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Matson, Robert D. <[email protected]> >> Subject: [meteorite-list] Nothing wrong with "just west of Mineral Point" >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 11:39 AM >> Hi Dirk, >> >> I have to agree with Richard -- I find no real fault with >> the article. >> The stone pictured does indeed look like a meteorite from >> this fall. >> "Just west of Mineral Point" is a perfectly believable >> meteorite >> landing point, particularly if "just west of" means a >> couple miles. >> >> I don't think people appreciate how long this strewn field >> will >> eventually turn out to be. The entry angle on the meteoroid >> was >> less than 10 degrees from horizontal, and for even a >> single >> fragmentation event at an altitude of 28 km, my model >> spreads >> meteorites in the 3-gram to 10-kilo mass range over 20 >> miles. >> Since there were additional fragmentations below 28 km, >> the >> strewn field is likely to be longer still. >> >> --Rob >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of >> Richard Kowalski >> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 7:24 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] nut bag reporting award >> Wisconsin >> >> I guess I don't see why you're calling it nutbag or >> lunacy. >> While Mineral Point does seem a too far east of Livingston, >> but the >> article states a none explicit "just west of"... >> >> 130 grams at $20 per gram = $2600, so the value of >> "thousands" >> sounds reasonable. >> >> What am I missing? >> >> -- >> Richard Kowalski >> Full Moon Photography >> IMCA #1081 >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > > > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
