Faith... Science... Its all how someone wants to take it. On topic, How about an angrite like NWA 6291 for sale for less then the Wisconsin meteorite was selling for?? That's a great deal for those that really understand rare meteorites. At one point Wi (still unofficial) was selling for over $300 per gram! This angrite, well under that price and so much more important... Certainly not "Ordinary" Hope everyone is doing well!
Greg C Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Sender: [email protected] Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:33:21 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King ofAngrites" for sale -... Faith is the action of making your self accept some thing you know not to be true. Other wise it is just learning. How did we get on this nonsense again? Tom In a message dated 7/23/2010 8:22:53 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: Hi Eric, I don't want to get drawn into another long debate, but I'd like to make a couple of observations. You wrote: "Funny, I never realized there was "proof" of what faith believes." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Well Eric, by definition, faith doesn't require proof, but often times matters of faith have quite a bit of evidence (a type of proof) to support them. I could give examples, but I would be wrong to bring them up on this List, and if I did I would be chastised by most of the members here. In your email, you not only accuse faith of not having any proofs, but you also say that it is only made up of, "conjecture and subjective interpretation of observation." Well Eric, to be honest, I find that much of today's science, and the science of the past, is also made up of much "conjecture and subjective interpretation of observation." It's not supposed to be like this, but much of science has a very religious feel to it. Science is supposed to examine data, evidence and facts, and then follow that data, evidence, facts wherever they may lead. Scientists are supposed to have completely open minds. They are not supposed to have *any agendas*. Unfortunately, all too many scientists do have agendas (presuppositions). They view the evidence through their own biased lenses. They view the evidence through their own type of "faith lense". Mark wrote the following to you, "science has a lot more 'faith' to it than most people realise!" I agree with him, and I think Mark Twain would also agree with him. With respect, Greg Lindh > Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:00:40 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King ofAngrites" for sale -... > > Funny, I never realized there was "proof" of what faith believes. Only > conjecture and subjective interpretation of observation. > > Eric > > > On 7/23/2010 12:52 AM, Mark Ford wrote: >> Good quote. >> >> I also like: >> >> "Science is almost the same as faith, but just sometimes, once in a >> while, the level of required proof is taken up a notch" >> >> Mark >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of GREG >> LINDH >> Sent: 23 July 2010 04:31 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: meteorite-list >> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King >> ofAngrites" for sale -... >> >> >> >> Hello Greg, >> >> I've always loved science, but I do think that some in the scientific >> community tend to stretch things a bit thin sometimes. All kinds of >> theories about all kinds of things are thrown around with little to >> support them. This reminds me of a quote by Mark Twain. The quote >> follows: >> >> "There is something fascinating about science. One gets such >> wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of >> fact." >> >> Something to think about.... >> >> >> Greg Lindh >> >> >> >> >> >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:51:24 -0400 >>> CC: [email protected]; [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of >>> >> Angrites" for sale -... >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> Isn't 'science' just that, "Science"... Ever evolving as ground truth >>> comes in? Without open minds and hard work by many dedicated >>> individuals, 'science' would not get very far, especially in the world >>> >> >>> of meteortitics! Much of the initial work and/or thoughts are educated >>> >> >>> suggestions which are meant to excite others in rational and sometimes >>> >> >>> heated discussions, no matter what scientific focus is being >>> discussed. I won't even bring up the evolution talks of the past... >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Greg Hupe >>> >>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 8:00 AM, "Rose, David MD"<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I agree with Jeff completely. Same thing happens in Medicine. And >>>> even when the data is peer reviewed, that doesn't mean that it is >>>> rock solid truth. It's a process of continual evaluation and >>>> refinement. >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:meteorite- >>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Grossman >>>> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:40 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of >>>> Angrites" for sale -... >>>> >>>> Yikes! Abstracts to meetings are not peer reviewed! >>>> >>>> jeff >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/21/2010 10:05 PM, Adam Hupe wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Jason and List, >>>>> >>>>> I do not refute Melinda Hutson's article that was never peer >>>>> reviewed and >>>>> contains several errors according to the classifying scientists. I >>>>> asked >>>>> scientists about the article and they stated, it is obvious that >>>>> she didn't read >>>>> the original peer reviewed abstract carefully, even mistaking the >>>>> type of >>>>> petrology that was discussed using formulas that simply do not >>>>> apply to the >>>>> texture NWA 2999 exhibits. >>>>> >>>>> There were several prestigious coauthors listed in the original >>>>> paper; Unique >>>>> Angrite NWA 2999: The Case For Samples From Mercury. >>>>> >>>>> Who am I to argue with the world's best? I will keep an open mind >>>>> and hope for >>>>> some ground truth that will hopefully settle it once and for all. >>>>> I think the >>>>> authors were making a point of having an open mind and that the >>>>> subject should >>>>> be debated possibly stimulated more scientific interest in >>>>> Angrites. It took a >>>>> long time to win over the scientific community that some of these >>>>> meteorites >>>>> were actually from Mars. It was debated to death and now nobody >>>>> argues about >>>>> the Shergottite parent body any more. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Adam >>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>> Visit the Archives at >>>>> >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> >>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> Visit the Archives at >>>> >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> >>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> P Please consider the impact to the environment before printing this >>>> email. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> P Please consider the impact to the environment before printing this >>>> email. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> Visit the Archives at >>>> >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> >>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> Visit the Archives at >>> >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> >>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: >> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us. Email [email protected]. You should not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose nor disclose their contents to any other person. >> >> GENERAL STATEMENT: >> >> Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. >> >> Registered address Rectory Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing, W Sussex BN15 0DP. Company No 1800317 >> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> >> > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
