Vrrrrp----WRONG----Faith is something that one accepts as the TRUTH or reality, but they can not PROVE it empirically.

Kirk......:-)
----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King ofAngrites"for sale -...


Faith is the action of making your self accept  some thing you know not to
be true.  Other wise it is just  learning.

How did we get on this nonsense again?

Tom

In a  message dated 7/23/2010 8:22:53 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
[email protected]  writes:


Hi Eric,

I don't want to get drawn into another long debate, but I'd like to make a
couple of  observations.  You wrote:

"Funny, I never realized there was  "proof" of what faith  believes."
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well Eric, by definition, faith doesn't require proof, but often  times
matters of faith have quite a bit of evidence (a type of proof) to support
them. I could give examples, but I would be wrong to bring them up on this
List, and if I did I would be chastised by most of the members  here.

In your email, you not only accuse faith of not having any proofs, but you
also say that it is only made up of, "conjecture and subjective
interpretation of observation."

Well Eric, to be honest, I find  that much of today's science, and the
science of the past, is also made up of  much "conjecture and subjective
interpretation of observation." It's not supposed to be like this, but much of
science has a very religious feel to  it.  Science is supposed to examine
data, evidence and facts, and then follow that data, evidence, facts wherever they may lead. Scientists are supposed to have completely open minds. They
are not supposed to have *any  agendas*.  Unfortunately, all too many
scientists do have agendas (presuppositions). They view the evidence through their own biased lenses. They view the evidence through their own type of
"faith  lense".

Mark wrote the following to you, "science has a lot more  'faith' to it
than most people realise!"

I agree with him, and I  think Mark Twain would also agree with him.


With  respect,

Greg Lindh




Date: Fri, 23 Jul  2010 01:00:40 -0700
From: [email protected]
To:  [email protected]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its  official! NWA 6291 "The King
ofAngrites" for sale -...

Funny, I  never realized there was "proof" of what faith believes. Only
 conjecture and subjective interpretation of observation.

 Eric


On 7/23/2010 12:52 AM, Mark Ford  wrote:
Good quote.

I also  like:

"Science is almost the same as faith, but just  sometimes, once in a
while, the level of required proof is taken up  a notch"

Mark


 -----Original Message-----
From:  [email protected]
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of  GREG
LINDH
Sent: 23 July 2010 04:31
To:  [email protected]
Cc: meteorite-list
Subject: Re:  [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King
ofAngrites" for  sale -...



Hello  Greg,

I've always loved science, but I do think that  some in the scientific
community tend to stretch things a bit thin  sometimes. All kinds of
theories about all kinds of things are  thrown around with little to
support them. This reminds me of a  quote by Mark Twain. The quote
follows:

 "There is something fascinating about science. One gets such
 wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of
 fact."

Something to think  about....


Greg  Lindh





From: [email protected]
To:  [email protected]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:51:24  -0400
CC: [email protected];  [email protected]
Subject: Re:  [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of

Angrites" for sale -...

Hello  everyone,

Isn't 'science' just that,  "Science"... Ever evolving as ground truth
comes in? Without  open minds and hard work by many dedicated
individuals,  'science' would not get very far, especially in the world


of meteortitics! Much of the initial work and/or  thoughts are educated


suggestions  which are meant to excite others in rational and sometimes


heated discussions, no matter what scientific  focus is being
discussed. I won't even bring up the evolution  talks of the past...

Best  Regards,
Greg Hupe

On Jul 22,  2010, at 8:00 AM, "Rose, David MD"<[email protected]>
 wrote:


I agree with Jeff  completely. Same thing happens in Medicine. And
even when  the data is peer reviewed, that doesn't mean that it is
rock  solid truth. It's a process of continual evaluation and
 refinement.

 David

-----Original  Message-----
From:  [email protected]  [mailto:meteorite-
[email protected]] On  Behalf Of Jeff Grossman
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:40  AM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: Re:  [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of
 Angrites" for sale -...

Yikes! Abstracts  to meetings are not peer reviewed!

 jeff


On 7/21/2010  10:05 PM, Adam Hupe wrote:

Hi Jason  and List,

I do not refute  Melinda Hutson's article that was never peer
reviewed  and
contains several errors according to the classifying  scientists. I
asked
scientists  about the article and they stated, it is obvious that
 she didn't read
the original peer reviewed abstract  carefully, even mistaking the
type  of
petrology that was discussed using formulas that  simply do not
apply to the
 texture NWA 2999 exhibits.

There  were several prestigious coauthors listed in the  original
paper; Unique
Angrite  NWA 2999: The Case For Samples From  Mercury.

Who am I to argue with  the world's best? I will keep an open mind
and hope  for
some ground truth that will hopefully settle it once  and for all.
I think the
authors  were making a point of having an open mind and that the
 subject should
be debated possibly stimulated more  scientific interest in
Angrites. It took  a
long time to win over the scientific community that  some of these
meteorites
were  actually from Mars. It was debated to death and now  nobody
argues about
the  Shergottite parent body any  more.

Best  Regards,

 Adam
 ______________________________________________
Visit the  Archives at

 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



 ______________________________________________
Visit the  Archives at

 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




 P Please consider the impact to the environment before printing  this
 email.






 P Please consider the impact to the environment before printing  this
 email.



 ______________________________________________
Visit the  Archives at

 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
 Visit the Archives at

 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Visit  the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This email and any files  transmitted with it are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify us. Email [email protected]. You
should not copy or use this email  or attachment(s) for any purpose nor
disclose their contents to any other  person.

GENERAL STATEMENT:

 Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be monitored and
communications carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the
system and  for other lawful purposes.

Registered address Rectory  Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing, W Sussex BN15
0DP. Company No  1800317


 ______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


______________________________________________
Visit the  Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list  mailing  list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to