Carl, Yes, I read your email. Look at the Met. Bulletin, NWA 5363 is still listed as provosional I am sorry but you will have to wait for Dr. Irving to publish the results of the O-Isotopes comparison. Anne M. Black _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc. _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/) In a message dated 7/24/2010 6:55:39 PM Mountain Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: Anne, Perhaps you did not read my last post (same thread) because I posted an email in it's entirety from Dr. Jambon. Evidently, The corrections to his original classification have been made and In his email he clearly states "NWA 5400 is undoubtedly paired with NWA 5363!". This leaves NO room for doubt. It is paired and the time for patience has past. We now know the whole story. He goes on to say that the Nom. Com and Science publications. already have this information. Thank you Dr. Jambon for this great news. Carl -- Carl or Debbie Esparza Meteoritemax
---- [email protected] wrote: > Kai, > > This was discussed at length only 6 weeks ago. Let's not do that again. > > The only way it will be known for certain whether those two meteorites are > paired, or not, will be after a comparative study of the Oxygen Isotopes is > done on both meteorites. > It has been done by Dr. Tony Irving for NWA 5400. > He has now been supplied with a fragment of NWA 5363. > And we will have to wait until he is done studying this second one. > > Patiently if at all possible! > > Anne M. Black > _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) > [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) > Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc. > _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/) > > > In a message dated 7/24/2010 4:19:47 PM Mountain Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > Hi Tom, > > I am confused by your post. You memtioned that 5363 is 5400 paired. > But NWA5400 is a brachnite like but not a brachnite due to its > terrestial osotope. It is a terrestial meteorite or ungrouped. To be a > brachnite and nwa5400 paired is a contradiction to me. Anyway I cannot > find the 5363 on meteotitical bulletin. > > Just post my thinking for your consideration. > > Thanks, > > Kai ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
