Anne, I hate to beat a dead horse ...... All due respect here but, am I missing something ? Yes, Dr. Irving is one of our most brilliant Scientist's we all know that but, he is not the only one. I repeat. Dr. jambon says it' so. So it's so. Sorry. Solong. Carl
-- Carl or Debbie Esparza Meteoritemax ---- [email protected] wrote: > Carl, > > Yes, I read your email. > > Look at the Met. Bulletin, NWA 5363 is still listed as provosional > I am sorry but you will have to wait for Dr. Irving to publish the results > of the O-Isotopes comparison. > > Anne M. Black > _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) > [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) > Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc. > _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/) > > > In a message dated 7/24/2010 6:55:39 PM Mountain Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > Anne, > Perhaps you did not read my last post (same thread) because I posted an > email in it's entirety from Dr. Jambon. Evidently, The corrections to his > original classification have been made and > In his email he clearly states "NWA 5400 is undoubtedly paired with NWA > 5363!". > This leaves NO room for doubt. It is paired and the time for patience has > past. > We now know the whole story. He goes on to say that the Nom. Com and > Science publications. already have this information. > Thank you Dr. Jambon for this great news. > Carl > -- > Carl or Debbie Esparza > Meteoritemax > > > ---- [email protected] wrote: > > Kai, > > > > This was discussed at length only 6 weeks ago. Let's not do that again. > > > > The only way it will be known for certain whether those two meteorites > are > > paired, or not, will be after a comparative study of the Oxygen Isotopes > is > > done on both meteorites. > > It has been done by Dr. Tony Irving for NWA 5400. > > He has now been supplied with a fragment of NWA 5363. > > And we will have to wait until he is done studying this second one. > > > > Patiently if at all possible! > > > > Anne M. Black > > _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) > > [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) > > Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc. > > _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/) > > > > > > In a message dated 7/24/2010 4:19:47 PM Mountain Daylight Time, > > [email protected] writes: > > Hi Tom, > > > > I am confused by your post. You memtioned that 5363 is 5400 paired. > > But NWA5400 is a brachnite like but not a brachnite due to its > > terrestial osotope. It is a terrestial meteorite or ungrouped. To be a > > brachnite and nwa5400 paired is a contradiction to me. Anyway I cannot > > find the 5363 on meteotitical bulletin. > > > > Just post my thinking for your consideration. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kai > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
