FWIW This one has been published since June and includes a K Falls comparison in the write-up
Geochemistry: (snip)These data suggest a designation of Group IIIF, an uncommon type (with <10 individuals known), although Ga is high compared to other IIIF irons by ~30%, probably owing to analytical error. This is the same group designation as for Klamath Falls, which was found ~78 km to the northwest, raising the possibility that both could have been in the same strewn field. However, the two meteorites are probably not paired, as Klamath Falls has a smaller kamacite bandwidth (0.5 mm), and concentrations for Ir, Pt, and Re that are ~0.002x, ~0.12x, and ~2.8x the values in the new iron. Rob Wesel www.nakhladogmeteorites.com www.facebook.com/Nakhla.Dog.Meteorites www.facebook.com/Rob.Wesel ------------------ We are the music makers... and we are the dreamers of the dreams. Willy Wonka, 1971 ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:34 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] "Oregon meteorite generating interest" -The Columbian Greetings, This sounds like another specimen of the Klamath Falls Meteorite. Probably traded by the local Indians of that area. Same Classification. --AL Mitterling ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
