Carl-
I'd argue that we have not captured MnSi from any comet. We have captured it
from the interior of interplanetary dust particles. Those particles were
collected during an influx of dust from one particular comet, and are
reasonably inferred to be constituents of that comet, but that is not
absolutely certain. And assuming that they are cometary, the amount of MnSi
is exceedingly small. I can't see any grounds for thinking it contributes
more than a trace amount of the total material. This is in contrast to CO2,
H2O, and other ices which have been observed to constitute a large fraction
of the total mass of an active comet. Those observations consist of direct
reflectance measurements of comet nucleuses, as well as of gases in the
comas and tails.
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Announces Comet Encounter News Conference
Elizabeth,
You express yourself much better than I do but, I still don't get your
reasoning.
It seems you are very quick to accept that what you *see* is dusty snow
and CO2 jets spewing out H2O snow and you may be right.
So, wouldn't catching actual manganese silicate material spewed out of a
Comet tell you at least as much about the make up of a comet as what the
*visual only* of the H2O tells you ?
I mean if these jets are spewing out H2O from these jets and that leads
you to conclude that this comet is made up of H2O then if you know for a
fact they also spew Manganese / silicate. Doesn't that offer even greater
evidence than a mere *observation* of H2O does?
We *captured* Brownleeite (manganese silicate) and we *observed* H2O!!
Which scenario holds more weight for proof ?
I would thing the verifiable physical evidence would be much more telling
about what these comets are made up of And yet no mention of a comet found
on earth may have a primary make up of manganese by anything I have read
so far? Additionally, To me this suggests that the Manganese being much
stronger than H2O might be all that would survive of a comet meteorite.
Maybe this tells us we should be looking for manganese meteorites to be
tested to see if they are cometary in origin?
I mean testing the isotopes in these manganese meteorites may just
surprise some of us? But , again. Only NASA Scientists can do this
testing.
If I were to find a manganese meteorite do you think anyone would help me
get it tested?
Because from a pure Scientific point of view keeping your mind open to
this possibility only makes Scientific sense. IMHO. And I can't wait to
hear more about your eventual tests on Hartley 2 pics and studies..
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
