Naveen,

I'll make three more observations then quit on this one.

1) You've been through the channels with IMCA - according to your email 
compilation, you complained to IMCA (13th July) three days after a note where 
Martin agreed that a refund was in order (10th July). Regardless of whether 
people think this counts as "trying very hard to resolve the issue", the IMCA 
acted, and both Martin and Stephan are now no longer members. IMCA involvement 
is at an end.

2) I draw attention to the amendment to the subject heading I made earlier in 
the thread. I don't like reading emails which use terms like 'fraud', 'scam', 
'systematically engaged in mail and wire fraud', 'one of their many victims', 
'illegal and unethical behaviour', etc. As far as I'm concerned, they are 
allegations and nothing more.

3) The IMCA has no connection with this mailing list.  You're not going to get 
this issue resolved by further emails to the MetList - we're not the police, 
we're collectors, scientists, students and traders. Ultimately this is going to 
be resolved, or not, between yourself and the sellers.


Mark

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to