It's not the mouse drivers.
I'm not into the perticulars but nt uses a "command" window, different than
DOS but does the same thing. When a proggy shells out to dos durring install
you will see the window pop up, SMM does the same thing and seems to work
fine. I don't think it's a shell problem but whatever it is, I hope it fixes
itself cause Point_Camax_SDRC_Unigraphics, can't write any new code for
SmartCAM. Guess I'll have to be happy with Win2k.
 I have not tried the translaters, I have never had much luck there. I
usually bring the file into acad14 with xchangeworks/solidworks and saveas a
R12 acad file, ending up with a wireframe.

I have a Dell P3, 500

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Gailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 6:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMARTCAM
Subject: Re: [mfg-smartcam] smartcam replacment


Thanks,
 Then tell me this, does XP actually have DOS or does the SMM module not use
a
DOS window?
 I have read much about XP and the DOS thing is scary. How about the file
translators, have you also tried them? Also, what pc are you using?
Michael

Bob Looney wrote:

> The SMM module seems to run fine on XP as do my macros that use the shell
> command. Interestingly this morning I fired up in XP to see if the SMM
would
> start and sure enough the command box popped up just like it does in
win2k.
> After messing with other functions for a short time FFM hung again. I did
> find however that by using the mouse to click the icon on the task bar to
> bring FFM back into focus I could use the keyboard to navigate just fine.
> Seems that only the mouse is not transmitting to FFM. I have seen odd
> behavior in win2k when using this intellimouse and I wonder if it's part
of
> that? I will unload my mouse software and try again and let you guys know.
>
> bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 4:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'smartcam user group'
> Subject: Re: [mfg-smartcam] smartcam replacment
>
> Excuse this XP rant, but......
> I have been wondering when this would be posted. Not only
> will Smartcam not run on XP, but any and ALL software that
> has modules like Smartcam's SMM, that run in a DOS box in
> the background. XP has NO DOS at all, guess what? This is
> when everybody buys a dedicated pc for Smartcam running
> Win2k, ME, 98 or 95, ugh. Not only Smartcam shells to DOS
> operations, I have quite a few other programs that will
> either live happily on a pre-XP machine or I buy all new
> software. Now you see why Microsoft did away with DOS, to
> sell more software.
>  Yet another sticking point, you will also need a pc built
> within the past year because XP won't run on any older pc's.
>  XP is not in my budget. I don't need it unless it is in an
> XP only environment. I figure that Smartcam will run for
> quite a few years just like it has for over 10 years.
>  I still have not seen a better software anywhere.
> Smartcam forever, and maybe for whatever comes after that
> too.
> Michael
>
> Bob Looney wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately we will all be switching in a cpl years. I just installed
> RC2
> > of winXP and SmartCAM is still hanging like it did in RC1. Can't put my
> > finger on it yet but sys process says it's still running and each click
of
> > the mouse dims the group pallet panel, but nothing works.
> > Oh well, I might be able to milk a couple more years out of it using
> Win2k.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 8:58 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [mfg-smartcam] smartcam replacment
> >
> > For the money, Gibbs will get you up and running fast. I see a var in
> > Atlanta
> > had a hard time with a horizontal, nothing to worry about, Gibbs does a
> nice
> > job with this.
> >  Also the Process save function in gibbs will help you over the long
run.
> > Training in Gibbs will be faster then MasterCAM and function will out do
> > fcam.
> > I have used all three over the past. I would suggest Gibbs over the
other
> > two.
> > Don O
> > ======================================================================
> > To find out more about this mailing list including how to unsubscribe,
> > send the message "info mfg-smartcam" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ======================================================================
> >
> > ======================================================================
> > To find out more about this mailing list including how to unsubscribe,
> > send the message "info mfg-smartcam" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ======================================================================
>
> --
> Michael Gailey
> Visit our CAD/CAM/CNC Programming and 3D modeling website
> http://www.microsystemsgeorgia.com/toc.htm
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ======================================================================
> To find out more about this mailing list including how to unsubscribe,
> send the message "info mfg-smartcam" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ======================================================================

--

Visit our Programming website at http://www.microsystemsgeorgia.com/toc.htm
Email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



======================================================================
To find out more about this mailing list including how to unsubscribe,
send the message "info mfg-smartcam" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
======================================================================

Reply via email to