On November 11, 1998 at 15:16, Kevin Noonan wrote:
> On the mail-server at my site, in the file mhonarc, the following line
> appears among the comments at the top.
>
> ## @(#) mhonarc 1.32 97/06/03 16:51:04 @(#)
>
> A page further down, this line of code appears.
>
> $VERSION = "2.1.0";
>
> So, I take it that the version of MHonArc is 2.1.0, but I'm puzzled by
> "1.32": what does this number refer to?
The "1.32" is the SCCS version of the file. Each source file
has a SCCS version.
$VERSION represents the version of the entire software package.
BTW, the latest version is v2.3.3.
> There are over a hundred MHonArc archives at my site. Would it be feasible
> to use a different resource file for every archive (or say, a standard one
> for most of them and customised resource files for certain archives)? Mail
> is automatically filtered into each archive as it arrives, by some means
> unknown to me at the moment.
Yes. Look at the DEFRCFILE resource for a clue on what you can do.
> Many (but not all) mail-attachments fail to be archived correctly. Something
> like the following then appears in the archived message:
>
> Warning
> Could not process part with given Content-Type: application/msword;
> name="OrbixPicoQACheckList.doc";
> x-mac-type="42494E41"; x-mac-creator="4D535744"
>
It is hard to say what the problem may be w/o having an actual sample
message that generates the message.
> Is this problem caused by bugs in the version of MHonArc we're using, or is
> there something wrong in the setup of MHonArc at our site? (Our mail server
> is running SunOS 5.6.)
Hard to say. You may want to try the latest version of MHonArc to
see if the problem still occurs.
--ewh
----
Earl Hood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<URL:http://www.oac.uci.edu/indiv/ehood/>
