Hi Earl, The attachments that *do* get successfully archived are saved with filenames like bin00035.bin. I've read the section in the FAQ headed "Why are attachments saved as a ".bin" files?". However, how do senders of the messages go about labelling the data properly (as the FAQ suggests)? There's a variety of mail clients here, but many people use Eudora, or Netscape or IE (and there's a mass movement underway to Outlook). (I know, I know, we should upgrade from 2.1.0 to 2.3.3) Thanks for your help, Kevin. >> Many (but not all) mail-attachments fail to be archived correctly. Something >> like the following then appears in the archived message: >> >> Warning >> Could not process part with given Content-Type: application/msword; >> name="OrbixPicoQACheckList.doc"; >> x-mac-type="42494E41"; x-mac-creator="4D535744" >> > >It is hard to say what the problem may be w/o having an actual sample >message that generates the message. > > >> Is this problem caused by bugs in the version of MHonArc we're using, or is >> there something wrong in the setup of MHonArc at our site? (Our mail server >> is running SunOS 5.6.) > >Hard to say. You may want to try the latest version of MHonArc to >see if the problem still occurs. > > --ewh > >---- >Earl Hood >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ><URL:http://www.oac.uci.edu/indiv/ehood/> Kevin Noonan _______________________________________________________ "Your legal concepts of property, expression, identity, movement, and context do not apply to us. They are based on matter, there is no matter here." - from "A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace", by JP Barlow.
