On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 19:55:19 +0000
Gerry Hickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Earl,
>> > > * simplicity > > * simplicity
>> > Uh? I'd say it's the other way round.
>> The concept of "simplicity" will vary depending on your point of
>> view. For example, MHonArc as it is today is simplier than a
>> dynamic system sense no other software tools (excluding Perl) is
>> required.
> Yes, a good point and I imagine it would be tricky to support all
> the database variants across a range of platforms.
DBI is a pretty good absrtaction layer for this sort of thing. Not
great as far as XML is concerned, but fairly transparent for the
rest.
>> A dynamic system requires the installation of a database, which
>> from my observations from many users, prefer not too muck with.
> I was assuming most most people running web servers these days
> would also be running a database, but I guess it's hard to tell
> without a user poll or something.
I'd warrant that there are more messages being archived by bobbyest
on (comparitively) tiny systems than there are under those running
SQL databases.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------(*) : http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--
