Gerry Hickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
% > But I have always found NT mail processing to be substandard
% > and so I have stayed away from it for this type of thing.
% Not sure what you mean here. Do you mean Perl parsers aren't as quick on
% NT or that NT is not very good as a mail server?
The mail server programs that run on NT do not seem to have
the robustness and flexibility that I am used to in a
traditional unix environment.
Perhaps I am too much of a sendmail bigot, but the ease
with which I can get perl to interact with sendmail
to do what I want is something that I have not been able to
do with NT.... Admittedly, I did not try very hard....
-----
John Sechrest . Helping people use
CEO PEAK - . computers and the Internet
Public Electronic . more effectively
Access to Knowledge,Inc .
1600 SW Western, Suite 180 . Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corvallis Oregon 97333 . (541) 754-7325
. http://www.peak.org/~sechrest
- Re: Idea for the future J C Lawrence
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
- Re: Idea for the future Earl Hood
- Re: Idea for the future Christopher Lindsey
- Another future (now) idea... Chip Atkinson
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
- Re: Idea for the future J C Lawrence
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
- Re: Idea for the future John Sechrest
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
- Re: Idea for the future John Sechrest
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
- Re: Idea for the future Claire McNab
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
- Re: Idea for the future Claire McNab
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
- Re: Idea for the future Earl Hood
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
- Re: Idea for the future Earl Hood
- Re: Idea for the future Gerry Hickman
