On 02/18/2013 07:38 PM, Chris Knadle wrote:
What's nice about the OpenDocument formats is that they are a fully documented
format_and_  implemented how they're documented.  If you do just a bit of
research into the OpenDocument format vs Microsoft's "Office Open XML"
formats, you'll see why this is an important distinction.

That's the point I'm usually making to various job databases; I see an AWFUL lot of sites that will take .DOCX files, yet don't take .ODT. I point out to them that ODT is an openly defined format, rather than proprietary like .DOCX, is supported by significantly more applications than .DOCX, and since .ODT was defined first, it should have been *implemented* first.
_______________________________________________
Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group                  http://mhvlug.org
http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug

Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm)                         Vassar College
 Feb 6 - Raspberry Pi
 Mar 6 - 10th Anniversary Meeting - Linux where you least expect it
 Apr 3 - Typography: Physical Art to Digital Art

Reply via email to