Please choose your words wisely on this subject, as there are many thinking people who are not pro-homosexual based upon sound science and a belief in evolution. Homosexuality runs counter to evolution. Evolution would suppose that life would gravitate to those life forms with the highest rate of reproduction, and, consequently the highest survival rates. Therefore, homosexuality can only be explained by evolution as an unnatural anomaly. For example, take a baby born with a third leg. Evolution would point out that bipeds are more advanced than quadrupeds. Therefore, a baby born with a third leg is unnatural, not the next progression in natural evolution. As another example, take a person born blind. Our society goes to great lengths and great expense to educate and integrate site impaired persons into our society. However, I have not seen great rallies of blind persons attempting to convince the rest of us that their blindness is natural. And of course using biology, physiology, and anatomy would readily and easily expose the absence of reproduction capability, as well as the absence of proper copulation equipment in homosexual relationships. Please rest assured that I am not some rabid homophobic. As long as no one is harmed, people should be free to do whatever they want in the privacy of their own home. However, that is not what most LGBT proponents want. They want their chosen lifestyle to be elevated and to be considered equal to a lifestyle that is in fact supported by science and evolution. Jim in Tucson
_______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower
