And.... Monogamy goes against nature. Men as animals are programmed to spread their seed so by your logic marriage is just as against nature as homosexuallity.
On 9/26/09, Dan Scolnick <[email protected]> wrote: > Homosexual acts are found in the entire animal kingdom - out in nature. > Therefore clearly NOT unnatural. > > > > In fact the construct that homosexual acts are somehow even remarkable > is an artificial construct that has emerged in the last 50 - 60 years. > Just like a household consists of a mom, dad and kids. > > > > Households used to be very extended, not the 1950's june cleaver style > household that we somehow think is "natural" today. > > > > If you want to consider it an anomaly by percentage, then blacks and > Hispanics and jews and catholics are all anomolies in the USA, as are > white men on the planet earth. > > > > If you want to get Jesuit/biblical about it, homosexuality is defined as > an "abomination". Sounds awful doesn't it? But wearing a mixture of > textiles, like cotton and wool at the same time is also considered an > "abomination". Not so bad, unless of course you're wearing polyester > along with the cotton and wool (and leather? Latex?), that I would > consider an abomination. > > > > Dan > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 7:19 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Gay Marraige > > > > In a message dated 9/26/2009 5:39:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > On Sep 26, 2009, at 2:39 PM, SOMEONE ELSE wrote: > > "Homosexuality runs counter to evolution. Evolution > would suppose that life would gravitate to those life forms with the > highest rate of reproduction, and, consequently the highest survival > rates. Therefore, homosexuality can only be explained by evolution as an > unnatural anomaly." > > > > Note I I did NOT write the above paragrah, but I DID write the paragraph > below as a response: > > > > No, It is not counter to evolution, but it is an anomaly, just like that > third leg or a one-eyed baby would be an anomaly. Things happen in > biochemistry that affect the brain, the body, and one's DNA. This > doesn't mean that we should choose to discard people because of an error > in their biochemical or DNA make-up, not does it mean that we are at > liberty to discriminate against them and prevent them from enjoying the > same legal rights as those considered among the norm. > > > > > > Jerry aka LGO > > -- Sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower
