That's 100% true. Monogamy sucks. That's why I am "single" and loving it.
Sent from my iPhone On Sep 27, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Pat Borka <[email protected]> wrote: > And.... Monogamy goes against nature. Men as animals are programmed to > spread their seed so by your logic marriage is just as against nature > as homosexuallity. > > > > On 9/26/09, Dan Scolnick <[email protected]> wrote: >> Homosexual acts are found in the entire animal kingdom - out in >> nature. >> Therefore clearly NOT unnatural. >> >> >> >> In fact the construct that homosexual acts are somehow even >> remarkable >> is an artificial construct that has emerged in the last 50 - 60 >> years. >> Just like a household consists of a mom, dad and kids. >> >> >> >> Households used to be very extended, not the 1950's june cleaver >> style >> household that we somehow think is "natural" today. >> >> >> >> If you want to consider it an anomaly by percentage, then blacks and >> Hispanics and jews and catholics are all anomolies in the USA, as are >> white men on the planet earth. >> >> >> >> If you want to get Jesuit/biblical about it, homosexuality is >> defined as >> an "abomination". Sounds awful doesn't it? But wearing a mixture of >> textiles, like cotton and wool at the same time is also considered an >> "abomination". Not so bad, unless of course you're wearing polyester >> along with the cotton and wool (and leather? Latex?), that I would >> consider an abomination. >> >> >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> [email protected] >> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 7:19 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Gay Marraige >> >> >> >> In a message dated 9/26/2009 5:39:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >> [email protected] writes: >> >> On Sep 26, 2009, at 2:39 PM, SOMEONE ELSE wrote: >> >> "Homosexuality runs counter to evolution. Evolution >> would suppose that life would gravitate to those life forms with the >> highest rate of reproduction, and, consequently the highest survival >> rates. Therefore, homosexuality can only be explained by evolution >> as an >> unnatural anomaly." >> >> >> >> Note I I did NOT write the above paragrah, but I DID write the >> paragraph >> below as a response: >> >> >> >> No, It is not counter to evolution, but it is an anomaly, just like >> that >> third leg or a one-eyed baby would be an anomaly. Things happen in >> biochemistry that affect the brain, the body, and one's DNA. This >> doesn't mean that we should choose to discard people because of an >> error >> in their biochemical or DNA make-up, not does it mean that we are at >> liberty to discriminate against them and prevent them from enjoying >> the >> same legal rights as those considered among the norm. >> >> >> >> >> >> Jerry aka LGO >> >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > _______________________________________________ > Miatapower mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower _______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower
