I'm getting both the mono and stereo sets. Doc Ebbetts has been waxing lyrical about the sound quality, can't wait.
On Sep 9, 1:16 pm, t bedford <[email protected]> wrote: > Not another nickel to the Beatles Machine. I doubt my ears would > actually be able to detect any major differences/nuances that the > remastering may bring out. > > And as for Beatles Rock Band , at $250 for the deluxe edition, buy > your kid a guitar and a Beatles fake book instead!! > > On Sep 9, 7:58 am, R3 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090908/music_nm/us_beatles_remasters > > > How many times will YOU buy the same music or how many ways can they > > be repackaged? > > Humm maybe we should start pushing for a remastered version of the > > Ruttles - All You Need Is Cash. > > > Originally we purchased most of our Beatles records as imports mostly > > from Holland and the UK. > > 1. They sounded better: cleaner, clearer, crisper - The reason, they > > were left in the presses longer - making the grooves deeper and > > sharper. > > 2. They weren't butchered as they were for US - We got more songs, the > > record distributor got less money! > > > Think I'll wait for Kinks Rock Band, Dave Clark 5 Rock Band, Who RB, > > Brit Pop RB > > Hey Headz who would you like to see Rock Banded? > > Paul Revere and the Raiders, Turtles, BBs, Jefferson Airplane? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Diamond Headz" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/michaellenz?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
