Thanks R3, I'm certainly no Star Treck expert, more my wife's thing, however the Uk film critics are saying that they the new film is considerably better than the last effort? Given the lack of action on my see Scottish island on a Sunday I'll probably go to see it next week! Cheers!
On Saturday, 15 June 2013 16:40:21 UTC+1, R3 wrote: > I have yet to see it. The REAL Trek purists pretty much hate it. Other > reviews like it as an action flick. It has not been making as much > money as Paramount hoped. I have seen the first few minutest: Kirk and > McCoy are running away from spear throwing aliens (Not sure why).Spock > has to snuff out a volcano as the Enterprise hides underwater (because > they don't want to violate the prime directive - not supposed to > interfere with alien cultures) Uh, isn't snuffing out a volcano a > violation?, Hiding UNDERWATER?? and I guess (SPOILER ALERT) what has > the Trek community most disturbed JJ lied to them "Cumberbach is > playing someone named John Harrison", well, he is really KHAN. > Additionally scenes from Wrath Of Khan are duplicated and inserted > just so the audience will relate to "Real" Star Trek. Lots of lens > flare and effects that make you go "oh cool". Bring extra belief > suspension for there are reportedly many crater sized plot holes. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Diamond Headz" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
