Ya know, I'm getting as little curious about this debate as well. It would seem to me, that since I own the modem and therefor it's my property, anything I care to do to it would be my bussiness. If the cable company wants to limit my bandwith in an attempt to extort more $ from me, then shouldn't they have to do that at their end? I mean this seems akin to telling me I can't upgrade my machine because it would run faster. Does anyone know of the true legalese reguarding this issue or can provide links to the emperical evidence?
***support the movement to free cable modems*** -- MichiMac is sponsored by Dan Knight of <http://lowendmac.com/>. / Buy books, CDs, videos, and more from Amazon.com \ / <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/lowendmac> \ Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> MichiMac list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/michimac.html> Send list messages to: <mailto:MichiMac@;mail.maclaunch.com> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:MichiMac-off@;mail.maclaunch.com> For digest mode, email: <mailto:MichiMac-digest@;mail.maclaunch.com> Subscription questions: <mailto:listmom@;lowendmac.com> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/michimac%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Macintosh? Get free email and more at Applelinks! <http://www.applelinks.com>
