Hello,
I'm still trying to propagate my TransactionCurrent object.
So, now, I'm on 'send_request' of my client interceptor.
in case where there's no OTSPolicy defined for my target object
(here my code)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CosTransactions::OTSPolicy_var ots = CosTransactions::OTSPolicy::_nil();
try
{
CORBA::Policy_var p =
rqst_info->target()->_get_policy(
CosTransactions::OTS_POLICY_TYPE );
ots = CosTransactions::OTSPolicy::_narrow( p );
}
catch ( CORBA::BAD_PARAM& )
{
std::cerr << " -> No OTS_POLICY_TYPE find for object\n";
/*
CosTransactions::TransactionalObject_var to =
CosTransactions::TransactionalObject::_narrow( rqst_info->target() );
if ( !CORBA::is_nil( to ) )
{
std::cerr << " -> Setting OTS_POLICY_VALUE to ADAPTS \n";
CORBA::Any policyValue;
policyValue <<= CosTransactions::ADAPTS;
CORBA::Policy_var p = _orb_var->create_policy(
CosTransactions::OTS_POLICY_TYPE , policyValue );
ots = CosTransactions::OTSPolicy::_narrow( p );
}
*/
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to test if the target object inherite from 'TransactionalObject'
to be compliant with OTS 1.1 object (I know that is not a mandatory stuf but I
would like to do it).
So, I've wrotte the above code (in comment). But this code seem to loop because
of the _narrow that call the server and then the ClientRequestInterceptor.
I just want to know the better way to avoid this loop ?
1) idl --do-not-query-server-for-narrow
2) forget about 'TransactionalObject'
3) any other ?
Any idea ?
Thanks all
+--------------------+
+ Laurent Marzullo
+
_______________________________________________
Mico-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mico.org/mailman/listinfo/mico-devel
