On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:21 AM, GWater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Neuer schrieb: >> >> So, at this point would I be correct or incorrect if I asserted that >> we have no confirmed successes w/ 6282? > > Unfortunatly it looks like "you are correct". > > But still 6242 works. (the sn9c201 webcam with the same sensor.)
Well, that's interesting. We've had recent reports of success w/ 6242 (w/ current master and last-before-libv4l)? If so, then the cams clearly are somehow different. Neither current master nor the old master work for me w/ the 6282 (broken in very different ways -- on last-before-libv4l I get a weird stuttering effect where old frames are interspersed w/ new ones, on current master I get a stable image but with WAY messed up colors, and grainy). The bridge setup (as indicated by dumping the bridge registers via debugfs) is very different for the two branches (though I'm not sure how much of that is due to libv4l selecting JPEG). So, I need to investigate this further, looks like. Dave --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Lets make microdia webcams plug'n play, (currently plug'n pray) To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Visit us online https://groups.google.com/group/microdia -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
