On 11/24/05, David Janes -- BlogMatrix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not much of an XSLT guy, to tell you truth. When I was in CompSci > and studying Prolog, our prof mentioned that the great thing about > Prolog was you didn't have to tell it everything like other languages. > My friend remarked "not only do you have to tell it everything, you have > to tell it everything in a really fucked up way". XSLT kind of reminds > me of that :-)
Heh, nicely put. I must admit I find writing the stuff a headache-generator, but like the way once it's done it's done. I tend to flip between languages quite a lot, and being able to carry over the same XSLT works out quite a timesaver compared to writing (or finding and integrating) parsers afresh. > I'm going to fix up the spec bugs mentioned so far, clarify my position > on "summary", allow feeds to be nested (because then comments can be > modeled very easy). Good man. > Code wise, I'm going to rework something I have lying around called "the > template rewriter" which will take MT, Blogger or (maybe) Wordpress > templates and add the hAtom markup automatically. I'll be looking for > victims for that. If you do WordPress, count me in as a victim. > And this weekend there's a thing called TorCamp which I'm considering > throwing together some powerpoints on Microformats. powerpoints!? What about OpenOffice? S5? (and is class="topleft" really semantic??) Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
