On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:38:34 +0100, Chris Messina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm. Sounds like a case for <blockquote cite="%url%"> or <cite>....
I'm using rel="cite" for references (with a profile) rather the <cite><a>
compound. This is so I can use rev="cite" for a list of trackbacks
recieved.
However, it would be interesting to do something like <a href="%url%"
rel="trackback">xyz</a>...
rel="trackback" is being used in the wild to designate a trackback url for
a document, not for a list of trackbacks recieved.
I didn't realize that the <cite> tag is basically worthless when it
comes to inline citations to an external source... does this mean that
one should always use blockquote and just style it to be inline?
Use <q> for inline quotes?
- Andreas
--
<URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
