On 12/12/05, David Osolkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Has the tag URI scheme been registered successfully? I don't see an > > update on its status on that page. > > > > If not, the info URI scheme (as was mentioned here recently), with the > > "sid" namespace, could be used the same way, and it has been > > registered. > > The tag scheme is RFC 4151: http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc4151
Yes, that is its scheme. But I didn't see if that indicates whether it has been registered formally. Ah, this is what I was looking for: http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes So, yes, it is registered. Apparently, just before info was. :) > The sid namespace appears to be for identifying collections of information > ("The sid namespace facilitates the identification of collections of > information assets. A collection of information assets could be an > organization, a website, a publisher, or a database."). The point here is > to identify a specific event. The tag scheme is similarly used to identify > specific entries, as opposed to collections. I suggest that tag is a better > match than sid ("more semantic", just to tie this back to microformats). Aye, perhaps I misunderstood it then; I'd thought a valid use might include its specified pattern *plus* an additional item content identification suffix. I'll check with the appropriate folks. Thanks! _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
