Hi Paul,
On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Paul Bryson wrote:
http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo
The XOXO format doesn't seem to allow, or specify, the use of heading
elements for multi-level outlines, such as <h2>, <h3>, etc. Is
there a
reason for this?
I don't think XOXO cares about "headers" -- everything is determined
by the structure. So, I assume <h2> et al would be part of the text
(or ignore) not part of the XOXO structure per se.
However, the very existence of headers implies that one can NOT do
trivial YAML-like serialization. Kevin, does your parser even try to
deal with that?
Also, none of these examples seem to use class="xoxo" in them. Is
this a
required feature, or optional?
Good question. I suspect the answer may be context-dependent. If
you're writing a parser, you could try to grab any list, but there's
always the risk that it wouldn't keep the "xoxo" contract implied by
the class name.
-- Ernie P.
This example uses <p>
http://diveintomark.org/public/2004/01/xo-embeddable.xo
This one uses <span> and <a>
http://homepage.mac.com/ctholland/thelab/outlines/
Also, none of these examples seem to use class="xoxo" in them. Is
this a
required feature, or optional?
Atamido
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
