brian suda wrote:
David Janes -- BlogMatrix wrote:
If you were to do this (I'm not saying it's a good or bad idea)
wouldn't you do it the other way, with the machine readable data
inside the title?
<abbr class="region" title="CA">California</a>,
<abbr class="country" title="US">U.S.A.</abbr>
except by definition of the ABBR element, the text node is the short
form. So it would have to be
<abbr class="region" title="California">CA</abbr>
you could do
<span class="region" title="CA">California</span>
and that is both valid HTML and the microformat parser should use
"California" in this instance.
Isn't this the opposite of datetime-design-pattern though? I'm thinking
here ... maybe we're operating under different assumptions ... of CA is
a computer readable form, not as an abbreviation.
Regards, etc...
David
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
