On Jan 18, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
Ryan King wrote:
As is, hReview sets the default lower bound at 1 (which is what
most examples in the wild use, despite what http://
microformats.org/wiki/reviews-formats seemed to indicate).
I'm a little confused about the process. I thought the actual
microformat followed the collection real world examples.
It does. And the current draft of hReview did just that.
Now you're apparently saying to ignore the real world examples
collected and just trust that the microformat makes sense. Which
is it?
What I was saying was that the examples were documented incorrectly.
Several examples had [0-5], notably Amazon, while in reality they
should have been [1-5]. I corrected those on the wiki a little bit
ago, because I realized that it was leading to confusion.
Also, please realize that we've learned a lot about what we now call
'the process,' since the time hReview was started. In fact, we've
learned a lot from developing hReview, as its was the first compound
microformat that was not an isomorphic translation of a preexisting
schema, therefore the first that had to go through a thorough collect
examples, review schemas, brainstorm, iterate loop. In a way, 'the
process' grew out of hReview.
-ryan
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
