Uh. I'd like to give that a chance, since this is a fairly purposed discussion so I presume that you're being serious?
The one thing that comes to mind as to why this approach wouldn't really make much sense is the sorting aspect... though I guess sorting by Nic/time would be ok... Even still, it seems no more semantic than my DL approach. Anyone else have opinions? Chris On 2/1/06, Paul Bryson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Chris Messina" wrote... > > I wonder than if we're going to be semantic purists and not use > > definition lists than what should we use? Ordered lists perhaps? I > > just don't think using paragraphs makes any sense, especially since > > each speaker very likely will have multiple paragraphs of prose. > > A table. One column for usernames, one column for what the user said. > Maybe another column with timecodes. Problems? > > > Atamido > > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
