Perhaps Danny can shed some light on his proposal?
On 3/27/06, Chris Casciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Chris Messina wrote: > > > On 3/27/06, Chris Casciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I guess I'm not clear where microformats (including hAtom or not) > >> would > >> serve to solve the handheld 'problem'. > > > > I'm not clear either, except that, like CSS Zen Garden, having one set > > of CSS classes to design for means that I could concoct one stylesheet > > that could be used as the handheld stylesheet for thousands of blogs > > instead of just one blog that chooses its own CSS classes. > > > > In that way, we could actually iterate on design knowing that there's > > some consistency in CSS classes. > > > > Chris > > But what about everything else on the page -- from navigation to > branding to any non-atom-like content? Or pages with multiple hatom > feeds? Or the wide variety of "stuff" that could be entry content -- > from images, photos or screenshots to lengthy articles -- that would > presumably go un-specified in an hatom-garden type setting. > > I guess I don't see how the others participating think the pages would > be consumed, and the win I see from hAtom (the ability to subscribe to > elements on any page of a site without shipping mulutple versions of a > document) isn't at all related to the handheld space. > > -- > [ Chris Casciano ] > [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ http://placenamehere.com ] > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
