Holy hell. This is rediculous. Gdata == the Word document format of web 2.0.
Does anyone know *anyone* in Google that will tell us why they're ignoring microformats?? Chris On 4/20/06, Sam Sethi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris Messina recently wrote about how Google's new Calendar missed a trick > by not supporting MF's. Google announced today > http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/index.html that they are providing a new > syndication protocol called Gdata which is based on Atom and RSS syndication > specs but it also supports query, authorisation and optimistic concurreny > (whatever that might be?)So is this the start of syndication wars. What > will Microsoft comeout with as a response - another format extension? > > Feature GData Atom* RSS 2.0 > Syndication Format Y Y Y > Queries Y N N > Updates Y Y N > Optimistic Concurrency Y N N > Authentication Y N N > > * The "Atom" column refers to both the syndication format and the > publication protocol. > > The reason for mentioning it here is because of the work around hAtom which > might link to this. I know Adam Bosworth has talked at length about an Atom > Store database (Google)and I was wondering if this is the first step in > querying the Atom Store. Google certainly seem to think so. "GData also > lets you send data to Google, and update data that Google already has." > > Any thoughts ... > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
