On 5/25/06 9:25 AM, "Scott Reynen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 25, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > >> What problem is this solving? >> >> What human readable content is this marking up? >> >> This is sounding off-topic for microformats. Am I missing something? > > I don't think it's about publishing microformats, but rather parsing > microformats. That may be off-topic for this list, but it might be > good to discuss on the microformats-dev list or somewhere It's sort-of offtopic - in other words, such discussions really should be on microformats-dev as you say, by folks who are actually working on parsing microformats. If you are working on parsing microformats, please say so here and sign up on the microformats-dev list! http://microformats.org/discuss > as a > simple re-usable tool for pulling microformats out of documents would > be useful for anyone building parsers. And more parsers makes the > benefits of microformats more obvious to publishers. Yes, that definitely makes sense. But discussions of extending URL/URI semantics for addressing bits of information? I'm not sure that actually has much bearing on parsing microformats. But like I said, perhaps I am missing something. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss