On Sep 16, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
I propose "luna" and "mars" microformats
See:
<http://microformats.org/wiki/luna-examples>
and
<http://microformats.org/wiki/mars-examples>
I guess i have two questions in an effort to move things along a bit...
- do we really need a /different/ microformat for every body being
described? is there a way to add a third value for type (or body, or
something more appropriate) to geo without breaking exiting spec /
rules or muddying things up too much?
- how is this data reused now, if at all. Looking at the wikipedia
external links it seems the data for the moon landing example all
seem to blow up because they're trying to plot you on the earth
instead.. (e.g. yahoo puts you in the middle of the pacific ocean).
--
[ Chris Casciano ]
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ http://placenamehere.com ]
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
