Just curious - but why aren't we using the uF wiki?
On 9/22/06, Chris Messina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the sake of discussion, I started a page of demos (done offline,
so I might be wrong in some of my code) for various tagcloud
techniques...
http://factorycity.net/demos/microformats/htagcloud/
I'll go download John's original page so that I incorporate his examples.
Chris
On 9/21/06, Stephen Paul Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you should be able to derive a
> > pie chart from the data embedded in this microformat! ;)
>
> That would be pretty cool ;) But for that, how useful is it to
> actually store the data in the class attributes? class is how uF
> finds data and names fields, but for data storage (especially numeric
> data like this) it seems odd... especially since you're then storing
> data invisibly to the user. I think tagclouds need to use class for
> styling to work (as has been said, for IE), but the uF needs to store
> in title or inside a tag (as is pretty much uF 'tradition'), to make
> the data easier to access both for computers AND the user.
> -- Singpolyma
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>
--
Chris Messina
Citizen Provocateur &
Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Work: http://citizenagency.com
Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog
Cell: 412 225-1051
Skype: factoryjoe
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Frances Berriman
http://www.fberriman.com
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
