In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gazza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>> allowing/encouraging research of more esoteric or less frequently
>>> used/published data types (species, moon/mars geolocations) on the Web.
>> Do you *really* think that species names are "esoteric"? <*boggle*>
>
>Under a definition of only being used or known by a small group of
>people, yes.
And you think that "Blackbird", "poodle", "T Rex", "potato", "French
Marigold", "Wisteria", "E. Coli", "HIV", "Rubella" or "human being" are
only used by a small group of people?
--
Andy Mabbett
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
