On Oct 4, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
One thing about this would be that all current parsers would have to
be tweaked to ignore <form> as the root of a data-extraction parseing.
I don't think it's quite that simple. What about cases where
microformats exist within <form>s, but not as part of <input>s?
Here's the first example I found of an hcard wrapped in a form:
<http://www.markthisdate.com/contactform.html>
What is the benefit of using the same root class name for forms
accepting a microformat as we use for the published microformat? Why
not just use something like class="vcard-input"? In addition to
avoiding such conflicts, that seems more descriptive.
Peace,
Scott
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
