On 10/18/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You forgot:
Actually, I was summarizing and synthesizing, not forgetting.
* Veteran Experts * Looking for new things * Might be looking/adopting things for the sake of coolness/newness * uF's seem new and cool? * Probably little exposure to uF (did they see it mentioned in a blog, search, or conference?) * Bleeding Edge Adopters * Fulfilling obligations from above * Trusted expertise for business decisions * Referred from a non-expert source to check viability HTH
I'm not sure this helps. This essentially washes out the picture of two types of users. Perhaps we should continue coalescing to include humans in general, because looking for new things is in the nature of the human spirit. My approach to this is to identify differences, although subtle, between users in order to better understand what kinds of resources would be most helpful. To do that, I'm attempting to build consensus using synthesis and simple questions. I'm a little confused about what you are suggesting. Can you elaborate? My current thoughts are that you meant either to say that there is only one type of new user, or that the list proffered is useless. Then again, I'm not a mind reader, so feel free to correct me. Ben _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
