On Oct 19, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin
Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
using more compact forms of the mf markup I get
Other than the "20061103T213000Z" format for dates, what did you
change?
I removed a redundant 'title'.
gzipped I get 293 vs 451 ratio 1.51
So - still an increase of over 50%.
That's not insignificant.
In itself, it's not significant, as it is well under a packet size, as
I said, and so will not affect download time.
A useful exercise would be to compare the whole page before and after
adding microformats, not just the fragment that changed.
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
