You can't use vote-for for this, because vote-for already has defined semantics; it represents a vote that has been cast, not the ability to cast a vote. It's already possible to use vote-for in both rel and rev; one indicates that the current page is a vote for the link destination, the other indicates that the link destination is a vote for the current page. I think the latter is not be considered authoritative. If you want to say this page provides a polling place, chose an attribute value that makes sense for that. Design for humans first, after all.
Using the previously suggested scenario, "Page A is a place where you can create a vote for Page B, i.e. a polling place", you could have these links: On page A: <a href="pageB" rel="poll">The page being voted on</a> On page B: <a href="pageA" rev="poll">Vote for this page here</a> The first link says "the current page (page A) is a poll for the destination of this link (page B)." The second link says "the linked page (page A) is a poll for this page (page B)." I'm not suggesting "poll" as the actual value to use, however; at least some research should be done to see if there's a widely-used term that would be more appropriate. - David On 10/31/06, Siegfried Gipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm, why not? Microformats do already define, that the XXX attribute with the value of YYY does have meaning ZZZ. So in this case microformats has already defined that the rev attribute with the value "vote-for" has some special meaning. Why not define that the rel attribut with the value "vote-for" has another meaning?
_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
