I don't think that makes any sense. You should make positive assertions about data, not negative ones... and why bother with a "not-a-license" schema? There's far too many negatives... as in licenses that it wouldn't be.... I think we ought only deal with what things *are* and not what they *aren't*.
Chris On 11/17/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Andy, On 11/17/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm starting to look at using rel="license". Am I right in thing that it > can be used to indicate that a page is NOT available under a license, as > well as for those that are? For instance: > > This page is <a rel="license" > href="http://www.example.com/copyright>copyright Example Ltd. > 2006</a> and may not be reproduced. I think that to indicate that something is NOT available under a certain license you'd really need something like a "norel" attribute. As in... <a norel="license" href="...">...</a> Or... you'd need a negative of the "license" token... maybe "nolicense" to use with the "rel" attribute... as in... <a rel="nolicense" href="...">...</a> See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- Chris Messina Citizen Provocateur & Open Source Ambassador-at-Large Work: http://citizenagency.com Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog Cell: 412 225-1051 Skype: factoryjoe This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
