Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2006 01:47 schrieb Benjamin West: > Mike, interesting list. > > > 1.) Includes visible-only > > Yeah, microformats only represent visible data. Sure? Think of: <link rel="tag" href="http://www.microformats.org/xfolk"; title="xfolk"/>
> > 11.) Considers existing HTML usage > > If a particular type of data isn't already being representing in HTML, > we typically avoid developing a format for it. Also, we use the same > techniques many authors use, such as using class and semantic HTML. Don't forget xhtml :) > > 17.) Inspired by needs of Bloggers and blog-related services > > Use cases involving bloggers are easy to come up with, however I > started working on microformats before I had a blog! Anyway, I > suspect blogger-based use cases are good because they are so > user-centric. It is certainly not the focus of microformats, I think. Unfortunately. Although microformats could be quite useful for other types of web resources, too. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
