On 1/3/07 3:35 PM, "Andy Mabbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >> two informative references: > [...] >> so I have now removed them: > > Apologies; the correct edit was: > > <http://microformats.org/wiki?title=hcard&diff=12103&oldid=121022> > > Though, bizarrely, Tantek has reverted that. ^^^^^^^^^ Please refrain from making ad-hominem attacks on the mailing list. > So, it seems that it *is* OK for me to add 'previously non-referenced in > the spec "References"', The E.123 reference was informative reference that provided a nice informative summary of a normative reference was only available by paid document, thus was not previously non-referenced. In addition, to make it even more clear I added a section that noted that authors MAY wish to use E.123 formatting for their telephone numbers. > *except* when Tantek orders me not to add > 'previously non-referenced in the spec "References"'. No, the coordinates references was both previously non-referenced, and not particularly relevant. I made an editor judgment call to remove a seemingly not-very-related link and removed it. That is sufficient reason. Finally, note that this is yet another meta-discussion email that you have sent, and thus as promised, absent any objections from anyone else on the list (or IRC), you will shortly be banned from the mailing-list for a week. I am sorry to do this, but your continued inability to listen to the requests that have been made, and your continued flood of meta-discussion emails on the list have left me no other choice in order to maintain the quality of discussion on this list. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
