On Jan 3, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Christopher St John wrote:
On 1/3/07, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, "Joe Andrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the record, I do object.
Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only person (in
email or
IRC) who has objected to banning Andy.
I'm a little late, but for the record, I'd object to banning Andy as
well.
I've been on lists where disruptive people had to be banned, but in
this case Andy is both well-intentioned and often (*cough* choking
this one out, hard to form the words) has good points.
This is definitely true. He has offered useful commentary, and I
appreciate that. However, I definitely would like to interject that I
think something does need to be done, and I applaud Tantek for taking
action -- the situation was becoming increasingly annoying and. As
someone who has, in another community, had to take moderative action
against a well-intentioned, visible member, I understand how delicate
something like this can be, and I approve of Tantek's decision to
moderate Andy, rather than ban him.
I would also like to thank him for bringing this issue into the
limelight so we can discuss it, and hopefully, help Andy to become a
better member of the community.
-Colin
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
