On 2/2/07, Derrick Lyndon Pallas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Take the example of a dead relative: there is no way to put a family tree with relatives you need to tag as "deceased" on your own page without a document level parser concluding that you are dead.
--- that is not true, you are not confusing that YOU ARE DEAD, you are only saying that the page has information about 'dead'. Rel-tag when applied to the whole page simply says that there is some information on this page related to 'X'. Nothing more... when you scope it to a specific microformat it gains further meaning about ONLY that object. In your family tree example, a rel-tag crawler would find a rel-tag of dead on the page and index it under the tagspace of 'dead'. This is expected, perfectly valid, and correct behavior. Now, when you look to a specific hCard searcher/spider, it will NOT apply rel-tag of 'dead' to all the hCards on the page, ONLY to the ones where it has been scoped (this is done my adding the rel-tag inside the class="vcard") it will not mix-up things and assume you are dead. Does that make sense? -brian -- brian suda http://suda.co.uk _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
