On 2/20/07, anders conbere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It derives it's meaning and value from the use of the global DNS system, regardless if you're actually looking to direct traffic to your openID or not, it's the nature of it being an anchor that gives it power.
Check out the 2.0 spec. There are some changes: http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0-11.html It introduces XRI into the mix (think brand new, non-DNS naming system) Wouldn't expect it to work so well in an <a> I take an "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" approach to new internet-scale naming systems, and remain something of a skeptic. Certainly 2.0 is no longer paving the cow paths. YMMV, etc. -cks -- Christopher St. John http://artofsystems.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
