>> <span class="tel">Tél.: <span class="value">(514) >123-4567</span></span> >> <span class="tel"><abbr class="type" title="fax">Téléc.</abbr>: ><span >> class="value">(514) 123-4568</span></span> > >Does the following make any sense to you as a potential solution to >i18n? [clip] >as opposed to stretching the semantics of the <abbr> tag?
This doesn't look like a stretch of <abbr>, Telec. is an abbreviation of Télécopieur, which is "fax" in English (and I believe it has already been established that properties are in English.) Would it be legal to write <abbr class="type" title="fax telecoupieur">Telec.</abbr> Thus satisfying the title for parsers and title for users? ~ Tim tjameswhite.com'>http://www.tjameswhite.com">tjameswhite.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
