From: "Andy Mabbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Wilkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
a slight loosening of the semantics of the abbr element.
<p class="tel>
<abbr class="type" title="fax">Téléc</abbr>.:
<span class="value">(514) 123-4568</span>
</p>
This thread is going in circles, On 12 March, I wrote, having suggested
the same possibility, that:
...there are concerns that that's an abuse of "abbr".
I think that abuse is too strong a term for what's happening here.
There is historical evidence that in the case of microformats, such a thing
is allowed.
To markup the following vcard example.
http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-examples#3.3.1_TEL_Type_Definition
TEL;TYPE=work,voice,pref,msg:+1-213-555-1234
<span class="tel">
<abbr class="type" title="pref">my</abbr>
<span class="type">work</span>
<abbr class="type" title="voice">phone</abbr>, with
<abbr class="type" title="msg">voicemail</abbr>:
<span class="value">+1-213-555-1234</span>
</span>
--
Paul Wilkins
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
