In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ciaran McNulty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why is "geo" still a draft, when it's included in the already-published >> hCard spec? > >It's the idea of pulling the GEO out of hCard and making it usable on >its own that is a draft specification, I believe. > >GEO and ADR as stand-alone microformats outside of hCard came later, >which is why they're at a less advanced stage than hCard. In that case, I think it satisfies the requirements, such as they are, at: <http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Specifications> and should be made a full specification. Any objections? -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
