In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ciaran
McNulty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why is "geo" still a draft, when it's included in the already-published
hCard spec?
It's the idea of pulling the GEO out of hCard and making it usable on
its own that is a draft specification, I believe.
GEO and ADR as stand-alone microformats outside of hCard came later,
which is why they're at a less advanced stage than hCard.
In that case, I think it satisfies the requirements, such as they are,
at:
<http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Specifications>
and should be made a full specification. Any objections?
I wrote that on 9 April, and there have been no objections, What now?
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
