The w3c is discussing an HTML5 [1], which is not to be confused with XHTML2 [2]. I'm not sure how serious or advanced this, but there's a discussion on Slashdot [3] (stop rolling your eyes).
It's definitely more semantic in design, though I've only lightly skimmed the doc. Note rel-tag [4], rel-bookmark [5] & the <article> tag [6], and rel-nofollow [7]. It looks like (for example), a lot of hAtom could be re-implemented using basic HTML5 tags and link-types. Regards, etc. [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/index.html#contents [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/ [3] http://tinyurl.com/354ycy [4] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-links.html#link-type15 [5] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-links.html#link-type2 [6] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-sections.html#article [7] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-links.html#link-type9 -- David Janes Founder, BlogMatrix http://www.blogmatrix.com http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
